Gender Differences in Peer and Parental In?uences: Body Image Disturbance

Journal of offspring and Adolescence, Vol. 33, No. 5, October 2004, pp. 421429 ( C 2004) sexual practice Differences in Peer and P arntal In? uences carcass see to it Disturbance, Self-Worth, and psychological Functioning in Pre jejune youngsterren Vicky Ph ars,1 Ari R. Steinberg,2 and J. Kevin Thompson3 Received April 17, 2003 revised January 20, 2004 accepted February 11, 2004 The connelectroconvulsive therapyions amongst corpse corporeal dust interference and psychological carrying into action claim been tumesce established in take ins of older stripling girls and school dayboyish women. Little is cognise, however, virtu twoy bole enter in jr. children.In particular, little is known to the highest pointedness possible sexual practice differences in pre insipid children. The catamenia schooling explored self-report remains hear overturn and psychological functioning in semblance to catch and agnate in? uences in 141 elementary school-aged girls and boys aged 811. Results imply that girls be to a greater extent concerned around dieting and atomic number 18 to a greater extent preoccupied with their exercising burden than be boys. Girls besides account a great capture for sparseness and a high send of family explanation of consume concerns than did boys.Cor dealings adverted that girls experiences of trunk send off concerns ( trunk dissatisfaction, bulimia, and drive for thinness) were link up to a return of factors (such as family write up of take in concerns, fellow in? uences, teasing, depression, and spheric self-worth) whereas boys experiences of consistence watch concerns were tie in to fewer factors. On the basis of these ? ndings, the assessment and interference of luggage compartment get wind concerns in pre juvenile children (especially girls) are of great importance. Implications for hindrance and prevention programs are discussed. KEY WORDS personate show peers parents.The preval ence of pietism and dust discover concerns among pre insipid children is overwhelming. Between 30 and 50% of insubstantial girls are either concerned about their exercising tip down or are actually dieting (e. g. , Thompson and 1 Vicky Phares, Ph. D. is a Professor and handler of clinical Training at the University of South Florida. She received her Ph. D. in Clinical psychological science from the University of Vermont. Her major interrogation interests are fathers and exploitational psychopathology. She recently published a textbook, Understanding Abnormal squirt Psychology with Wiley and Sons.To whom correspondence should be channeliseed at University of South Florida, Department of Psychology, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, PCD 4118G, Tampa, Florida 33620 e-mail emailprotected cas. usf. edu. 2 Ari R. Steinberg, Ph. D. charter from the University of South Florida, where she earned her M. A. in Psychology and her Ph. D. in Clinical Psychology. Her major investigate inter ests are cognitive and psycho companionable correlates to the stand upment of remains image e-mail emailprotected cas. usf. edu. 3 J. Kevin Thompson, Ph. D. is a Professor of Psychology at the University of South Florida.He received his Ph. D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Georgia. His major research interests are physical structure image and consume disorders. Smolak, 2001). Such concerns about size of it and/or appearance become been install to predict onset of ingest disturbances prospectively (Cattarin and Thompson, 1994 Stice, 2001). Although intimately of the previous research on eating disorders has foc apply on self-aggrandizing women and adolescent girls, it has recently been shown that pitch concerns and dust image disturbance experience in juvenilityer girls and boys (Cusumano and Thompson, 2001 Field et al. 2001 Ricciardelli and McCabe, 2001 Ricciardelli et al. , 2000 VanderWal and Thelen, 2000). Self-esteem concerns appear to be link up t o body image disturbance in puppyish children, merely in that location does not appear to be a causal link among self-esteem and body image disturbance (Mendelson et al. , 1996). Speci? cally, body image disturbance and poor self-esteem appear to develop con newly in young boys and girls. Given these important issues, the on-line(prenominal) issue attempted to examine the psychological, familial, and social correlates of clog concerns and eating disturbances in preteen girls and boys. 21 0047-2891/04/1000-0421/0 C 2004 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 422 BODY IMAGE AND DIETING bearing IN ADOLESCENTS AND CHILDREN The connections in the midst of body image disturbance and psychological maladjustment in adolescence gull been soundly documented. in that respect appears to be pervasive concerns among adolescents with respect to their weight, body image, dieting, and eating behavior (Smolak and Levine, 2001 Thompson et al. , 1999). In fact, averageweight adolescent girls are almost as apt(predicate) to be dieting as their overweight peers (Rodin et al. , 1985).These patterns are spare in some(prenominal) clinical and nonclinical ingests. Bunnell et al. (1992) investigated body precondition concerns among 5 hears of female person person adolescents anorexia nervosa clients, bulimia nervosa clients, subclinical anorexia, subclinical bulimia, and noneating garbled females. They found that body watch dissatisfaction was a prominent concern for most adolescent girls unheeding of their level of eating pathology. Thus, by the time of adolescence, the legal age of girls have developed weight and body concerns and many have tried dieting or different strategies to alter their physical appearance.Although these issues have received less research heed in preadolescent children, many of the same patterns have emerged in studies of younger children. Children as young as 6 years old extinguish dissatisfaction with their body and a substantial amount (40%) have attempted to miss weight (Thelen et al. , 1992). at that place is evidence that children as young as 7 are reliable in their reports of dieting (Kostanski and Gullone, 1999). In a sample of thirdthrough sixth-graders, children were very knowledgeable about weight aver methods (Schur et al. , 2000). tree trunk dissatisfaction appears to be related to dietary restraint rather than age. In a subject see that compared 9-year-olds and 14-year-olds, girls with highly restrained eating patterns in both age groups showed moo body esteem, and discontent with their body shape and weight (Hill et al. , 1992). Consistent with research on adolescents and young self-aggrandizings, young girls tend to show this dissatisfaction to a greater extent than boys. In samples of children in the midst of the ages of 5 and 11 (Collins, 1991 Cusumano and Thompson, 2001 Williamson and Delin, 2001 Wood et al. 1996), girls inform signi? cantly greater body dissatisfaction than did boys. Mo re girls than boys were dieting in a sample of 1012 year olds (Sands et al. , 1997). Thus, the normative discontent that is shown in adolescent girls and young women (Rodin et al. , 1985) appears to be present in younger girls as well. familial INFLUENCES ON BODY IMAGE A logical question relates to why these body image disturbances occur in such young children. Theories of Phares, Steinberg, and Thompson body image disturbance include biological, sociocultural, familial, and peer-related in? ences (Smolak and Levine, 2001 Steinberg and Phares, 2001). upstartly, a great patronage of attention has been focused on familial and peer in? uences in the instruction of body image. Regarding familial in? uences, 2 primary mechanisms have been proposed enate modeling of dysfunctional eating attitudes and behavior, and parents in? uence over their children by direct transmission of weight-related attitudes and opinions, such as comments or teasing. There has been sign for both mechanisms in adolescent samples.When compared with m differents of daughters in a nonclinical control group, mothers of adolescent girls with disordered eating patterns showed greater eating disturbance, had a longer storey of dieting, and wanted their daughters to lose more weight (Pike and Rodin, 1991). Rieves and Cash (1996) found that daughters eating disturbances were related to their perceptions of maternal concern with appearance and preoccupation with being overweight. These studies bring up that adolescent girls whitethorn be modeling dysfunctional eating attitudes and behaviors from their parents. There is evidence that parents in? ence their adolescents eating disturbances and body image through direct transmission of weight-related attitudes and opinions. Thelen and Cormier (1995) found that mothers and fathers encouragement of weight control were related to daughters bank to be thinner, daughters weight, and dieting behaviors. When actual body weight was controlled statistic ally, only the human relationship amidst daughters dieting and fathers encouragement to diet remained signi? cant. Direct enatic comments about childrens weight had a strong relation with childrens body image, especially mothers comments about their daughters (Smolak et al. 1999). Thus, it appears that both maternal and paternal in? uences may be relevant to the development of body image concerns and related issues. These ? ndings suggest that parents can in? uence their attitudes and opinions of weight through direct transmission, although the relative strikingness of mothers versus fathers has yet to be established. Negative verbal commentary within the family, besides known as teasing, has received attention recently. comb-out can be considered an indirect transmission of maternal(p) attitudes and opinions. In a sample of lder adolescent college students, enate teasing of females, exclusively not of males, was related to body image dissatisfaction (Schwartz et al. , 1999) . In addition, high(prenominal)(prenominal) levels of teasing and appearance-related feedback predicted high levels of psychological disturbance. Taken together, these studies all tear down to the relationships betwixt adolescents body image concerns and parental attitudes and behaviors. Few studies, however, have addressed these issues in younger children. sexual activity Differences in Peer and enate In? uences PEER INFLUENCES ON BODY IMAGE The same point can be made for peer in? uences on body image.Although signi? cant relationships have been found in samples of adolescents, few studies have explored these issues in younger children. When investigating adolescents, one convey found that adolescents disturbed eating and weight concerns were related to the dieting and weight control strategies of peers as well as to the amount they inform talking with peers about dieting (Levine et al. , 1994). In addition, adolescent girls reported their peers as one of the primary source s of information on weight control and dieting (Desmond et al. , 1986). Adolescent girls, more so than adolescent boys, worried about their weight, ? ure, and popularity with peers (Wadden et al. , 1991). Negative verbal commentary by peers has been explored in relation to body image disturbance. tetchy by peers seems to have a strong in? uence on the development of eating and weight concerns (Rieves and Cash, 1996 Thompson, 1996 Thompson and Heinberg, 1993). rag by peers tends to be common during childishness with physical appearance and weight as the primary focus. Cash (1995) reported that 72% of college women recalled being bug as children, usually with respect to their facial features or body weight and shape.In a chew over of adolescent girls, Cattarin and Thompson (1994) found that teasing was a signi? cant predictor of boilers suit appearance dissatisfaction above and beyond the in? uence of age, maturational status, and level of obesity. In one of the few studies done with children, Oliver and Thelen (1996) found that childrens perceptions of peers negative messages and increased likability by being thin in? uenced their body image and weight concerns. Overall, peers attitudes and teasing appear to in? uence body image concerns. Taken together, these studies suggest patterns of familial and peer in? ence on the development of body image concerns. Little is known, however, about the associations of these issues within young children. Even less is known about how familial and peer in? uences are related to body image concerns and psychological functioning in young girls versus young boys. THE CURRENT STUDY On the basis of the ? ndings with adolescent and young adult populations, the current field of force extends these research questions to preadolescent girls and boys. Because the majority of previous research was defineed to maternal in? ences on body image (Phares, 1996), the current need will also extend this roue of research to explore pa ternal in? uences on body image. It was hypothesized that gender effects would be revealed concerning young chil- 423 drens body image concerns, with young girls reporting more body dissatisfaction and weight-appearance-related concerns than young boys. It was expected that both girls and boys who reported higher(prenominal) levels of body image concerns would show more psychological problems as exhibited by higher levels of depression and overturn levels of perceived competence. Both familial in? uences and peer in? ences were expected to be related to girls and boys body image and eating concerns. METHOD Participants A sum total of 141 children (64 boys and 77 girls) from two public elementary schools in a large urban orbit in the southeast participated in the study. On the basis of a male monarch analysis (? level = 0. 05, power = 0. 80, and a medium effect size), it was intractable that a minimum sample size of 64 boys and 64 girls would be equal to test the hypotheses (C ohen, 1992). The mean age of the overall sample was 9. 23 years (SD = 1. 08) and did not differ between boys (M = 9. 31 SD = 1. 04) and girls (M = 9. 7 SD = 1. 12 t(139) = 0. 79 p = 0. 434). The sample was ethnically diverse (63. 1% Caucasian, 21. 3% African American, 12. 8% Hispanic/Latino/Latina, 0. 7% Asian American, and 2. 1% other). With respect to grade level, 14. 2% were in the second grade, 44. 0% were in the third grade, 27. 6% were in the fourth grade, and 14. 2% were in the ? fth grade. The diffusion of girls and boys did not differ for race/ethnicity or for grade level ( ps 0. 05). A total of 77 mothers and 48 fathers participated in the study. Measures Family In? uences deuce measures were used to assess functioning within the family.The Perceptions of Teasing outperform (POTS) is a revised and extended reading of the Physical Appearance Related Teasing Scale (Thompson et al. , 1995). The measure has been used with children as young as 10 years old, in that locatio nfore, the 8- and 9-year-old participants in this study were younger than previous participants who absolute the POTS. The weight unit Teasing Scale, which consists of 6 questions concerned with the frequency of appearancerelated teasing, was used in the current study. Participants answered these questions for their mother and father separately, and scores were totaled for an overall frequency of parental teasing score. high add up on this 5-point scale re? ect greater frequency of negative verbal commentary. Coef? cient ? s in the current study were adequate for 424 reports of mothers (0. 72) and fathers (0. 84). Note that only 24% of the children in this sample scored above a 0 on this measure. Children, mothers, and fathers stainless the Family History of take in (FHE-Child and FHE-Parent Moreno and Thelen, 1993). Both versions of the FHE are scored along a 5-point Likert scale and are used to assess attitudes concerning body shape and weight, dieting, and familial eating pa tterns and behaviors.The parent version assesses parents perceptions whereas the child version focuses on the childs perception of the family. Higher numbers re? ect greater familial concern with body shape and weight. Reliabilities in the current study were adequate based on the coef? cient ? for children (0. 80), mothers (0. 77), and fathers (0. 75). Peer In? uences Children realised the entry of Peer In? uence on eat Concerns (IPIEC Oliver and Thelen, 1996), which is a 30-item measure of peer in? uence on childrens eating and body shape concerns.The measure consists of 5 factors Messages, Interactions/Girls, Interactions/Boys, Likability/Girls, and Likability/Boys. The Messages factor re? ects the frequency with which children receive negative messages from peers regarding their body or eating behaviors. The Interactions factors address the frequency with which children interact with peers (boys and girls) about weight and eating habits. The Likability factors measure the degr ee to which children believe that being thin will increase the degree to which they are liked by their peers (boys and girls).Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where higher numbers re? ect greater peer in? uence. For the present study, total mean scale scores of all items were used to calculate a total peer in? uence score. The coef? cient ? in the current study (0. 94) was strong. obesity Level The Quetelets Index of Fatness is a body great deal index (BMI) that is computed for each child with the following formula weight/(squared height). The Quetelets Index is used routinely as an index of adiposity and is correspond highly with skinfold and other fatness measures.Height and weight were induceed by self-report. preceding research has shown that young adolescents self-reports are highly correlated with actual measuring sticks of weight and height (Brooks-Gunn et al. , 1987 Field et al. , 2002). alimentation Disturbance and Body range Children correct the ingest d isturbance Inventory for Children (EDI-C Garner, 1984), which measures self- Phares, Steinberg, and Thompson perceptions of eating disturbances and body image. Items are answered on a 6-point Likert scale and subscales are averaged to produce mean scale scores. trio of the eight subscales were used in the present study set out for scantiness (excessive concern with dieting, preoccupation with weight, and extreme fear of weight gain), Body Dissatisfaction (dissatisfaction with overall shape and with the size of those body regions of most concern to individuals with eating disorders), and bulimia (thinking about and move in uncontrollable overeating, or binging behaviors). Coef? cient ? s were adequate in the current sample for the Drive for Thinness subscale (0. 83), the Body Dissatisfaction subscale (0. 63), and the bulimia subscale (0. 76).On all subscales, higher numbers re? ect higher levels of body image concerns or related behaviors. mental Functioning Children completed 2 measures that assess their psychological functioning. The Childrens first Inventory (CDI Kovacs, 1992) is a widely used self-report measure of affective, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms of depression in children. Items are scores on a 0- to 2-point scale, with higher scores re? ecting higher levels of depression. The total CDI score, which showed good reliability in the current sample (coef? cient ? = 0. 91) was used. Children also completed the Self-Perception Pro? e for Children (Harter, 1985), which assesses childrens perceptions of themselves across different domains. For the current study, the innovation-wide self-worth subscale was used. Note that the spheric self-worth scale consists of questions that are separate from any of the other domains (e. g. , the physical appearance domain is not subsumed under the global self-worth rating). Higher scores on the 4-point scale re? ect higher perceptions of global self-worth. Adequate reliability (coef? cient ? = 0. 79) was sho wn in the current sample. Procedures Active parental consent and child assent were given for involvement in the study. one time consent and assent were obtained and data collection was initiated, no children dropped out of the study nor did any children refuse to take part in the study. Participating children completed questionnaires in small groups at school. Examiners read each question loud and children put their answers on the questionnaires individually. Parents were mailed their questionnaires (the FHE-P and a brief demographics form) and were asked to return their completed questionnaires to the researchers in a postage-paid envelope. Multiple mail- Gender Differences in Peer and agnatic In? uences prorogue I.Means and t-Tests for Gender Comparisons Variable Body jalopy index (BMI) Body Dissatisfaction bulimia Drive for Thinness Family History of EatingChild Inventory of Peer In? uence on Eating Concerns Perceptions of TeasingFrequency Depression Global Self-Worth a Stati stically 425 Girls (n = 77), mean (SD) 18. 91 (3. 80) 20. 29 (10. 10) 13. 38 (7. 32) 18. 21 (9. 64) 19. 99 (8. 38) 1. 80 (0. 84) 1. 62 (4. 62) 48. 83 (12. 06) 19. 06 (4. 74) Boys (n = 64), mean (SD) 19. 01 (3. 80) 18. 38 (8. 83) 15. 05 (7. 63) 13. 13 (6. 61) 17. 56 (5. 54) 1. 66 (0. 73) 1. 33 (2. 97) 49. 13 (13. 47) 18. 92 (4. 75) t 0. 09 ? 1. 18 1. 32 ? 3. 58 ? 1. 98 ? . 02 ? 0. 44 0. 14 ? 0. 18 p 0. 932 0. 239 0. 188 0. 000a 0. 049a 0. 311 0. 660 0. 892 0. 859 signi? cant. ings were sent in an attempt to obtain maximum parental participation. The ? nal response rate was 54. 6% (n = 77) for mothers and 34. 0% (n = 48) for fathers. RESULTS Gender Comparisons As expected, girls showed more or lesswhat greater concern over weight and body image issues than did boys. Signi? cantly more girls (61. 0%) than boys (35. 9%) wanted to lose weight, ? 2 (2) = 13. 38, p 0. 001. As can be seen in add-in I, there were additional gender differences on body image, restriction, and disturbed eati ng behaviors measures.When compared with boys, girls reported a higher drive for thinness, t(139) = ? 3. 58 p 0. 001, and a more troubled family history of eating concerns, t(139) = ? 1. 98 p 0. 05 (i. e. , girls reported receiving more messages regarding weight and dieting from their parents than did boys). Girls and boys did not differ signi? cantly on body spate index, body dissatisfaction, bulimic behaviors, peers eating concerns, or frequency of parental teasing. There were also no gen- der differences in depressive symptoms or global selfworth. Thus, there was virtually limited hurt for gender differences.Relations Between Body Image and Psychological Functioning Correlational analyses were computed in order to investigate the relations between body image and psychological functioning. As can be seen in Table II, signi? cant correlations were revealed for all of the measures for girls and most of the measures for boys. Girls reports of body dissatisfaction, bulimic tenden cies, and drive for thinness were related to higher levels of depression and lower levels of global self-worth. For boys, body dissatisfaction was related to higher levels of depression and lower levels of global self-worth.bulimic tendencies were not significantly related to either depressive symptoms or global self-worth. Drive for thinness was related to lower levels of global self-worth unless was not signi? cantly related to depression. Thus, the expected pattern of results was found for girls consistently, and partial place upright was found for boys. Table II. Correlations Between Eating Disturbance and Psychological Functioning Variables 1 1. Body Dissatisfaction 2. Bulimia 3. Drive for Thinness 4. Family History of EatingChild 5. Inventory of Peer In? uences on Eating Concerns 6. Perceptions of TeasingFrequency 7. Depression 8.Global Self-Worth 0. 42 0. 42 0. 32? 0. 26? 0. 44 0. 37 ?0. 42 2 0. 47 0. 25? 0. 23 0. 10 0. 29? 0. 14 ? 0. 01 3 0. 56 0. 55 0. 67 0. 32? 0. 60 0. 19 ? 0. 39? 4 0. 53 0. 56 0. 58 0. 12 0. 41 ?0. 03 ? 0. 03 5 0. 49 0. 55 0. 48 0. 53 0. 18 0. 29? ?0. 21 6 0. 32 0. 34 0. 27? 0. 44 0. 38 0. 29? ?0. 37 7 0. 58 0. 60 0. 55 0. 63 0. 59 0. 45 ? 0. 58 8 ? 0. 64 ?0. 48 ?0. 49 ?0. 52 ?0. 52 ?0. 35 ?0. 71 Note. Boys are in the lower left quadrant and girls are in the upper expert quadrant. ? p 0. 5 p 0. 01 p 0. 001. 426 Relations Between enate In? uences, Peer In? uences, and Body Image Disturbance Table II also reports the results of correlations for parental in? uences, peer in? uences, and body image disturbance. For girls, all of the correlations were signi? cant. Speci? cally, girls body dissatisfaction, bulimia, and drive for thinness were related to higher levels of family history of eating concerns, peer in? uences on eating concerns, and perceptions of teasing. For boys, 7 of the 9 correlations were signi? cant. Speci? cally, boys body dissatisfaction was signi? antly related to higher levels of family history of e ating concerns, peer in? uences on eating concerns, and perceptions of teasing. Boys tendency toward bulimia was signi? cantly related to perceptions of teasing, but not family history or peer in? uences. Boys drive for thinness was related to family history, peer in? uences, and perceptions of teasing. Overall, there was somewhat more support for the connections between parental in? uences, peer in? uences, and body image disturbance for girls, but there was clear evidence of connections for boys when body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness were considered.Phares, Steinberg, and Thompson of family history and childrens reports of eating disturbance and body image concerns. These ? ndings suggest that childrens perceptions of family history and parents perceptions of family history are not related strongly. Missing agnatic Data To assess whether there were systematic differences between parents who did or did not participate, t tests were conducted to examine any possible diffe rences between children whose parents returned questionnaires and those children whose parents did not return questionnaires.With the exception of family history, t(139) = 2. 33, p 0. 02, no other signi? cant differences were revealed. Children whose parents returned questionnaires reported signi? cantly higher levels of family emphasis on weight and body shape (M = 20. 15, SD = 7. 90) than children whose parents did not return questionnaires (M = 17. 32, SD = 6. 20). There were no signi? cant differences between children with parental data and children without parental data on the following variables Body Dissatisfaction (from the EDI-C), Bulimia (from the EDI-C), Drive for Thinness (from the EDI-C), peer in? ences (from the IPIEC), or perceptions to teasing (from the POTS). Thus, the searching analyses with parental data are likely to be generalizable for all of the variables other than family history. Parental Data For exploratory purposes, paired t tests were conducted to exam ine the differences in mothers and fathers reports of parental in? uence regarding weight and body shape concerns. Mothers (M = 18. 57, SD = 5. 32) placed more emphasis on weight and body shape concerns than did fathers (M = 15. 94, SD = 5. 29), t(47) = ? 3. 96, p 0. 001. just examination of parental differences revealed that mothers reported placing more importance on weight and body image concerns than did fathers for both their daughters, t(29) = ? 2. 93, p 0. 006, and sons, t(27) = ? 2. 61, p 0. 01. These results suggest that, regardless of child gender, mothers tend to place more emphasis on weight and dieting than do fathers. To examine the relationship between childrens selfreports and parental reports, correlations were conducted for parents reports of family history of eating concerns and childrens reports of eating disturbance and psychological functioning.A signi? cant correlation was revealed for mothers reports of family history and childrens reports of family histor y, r (77) = 0. 25, p 0. 05. These results suggest that mothers and children perceived similar familial in? uences regarding weight and body shape. In addition, signi? cant correlations were revealed for maternal report of family history and childrens report of global self-worth, r (77) = ? 0. 27, p 0. 05. No other signi? cant correlations were revealed for maternal or paternal reportsDISCUSSION Overall, the results of this study support and extend previous research suggesting that both parental and peer in? uences are related to the development of body image and weight concerns in preadolescent girls and boys. It is likely that both factors play an integral part in childrens formations of maladaptive beliefs, attitudes, and expectations concerning weight, physical appearance, and body image. Further, there appear to be some differences but some similarities in how girls and boys experience these issues.Similar to previous research, girls in this study exhibited a somewhat greater degree of concern regarding weight and body image issues than did boys. Not only were they more aware of issues surrounding weight and dieting, but girls were more active in attempts to become and/or remain thin. In addition, it appears that girls received more messages within the family setting regarding weight and body image concerns. Although most investigations of body image concerns tend to recruit only female participants (e. g. , Attie and Brooks-Gunn, 1989 Cattarin and Thompson, 1994), the studies of gender differencesGender Differences in Peer and Parental In? uences in body image have used primarily adolescent samples (e. g. , Childress et al. , 1993 reviewed in Cohane and Pope, 2001). The present results support similar ? ndings for preadolescent children, which indicates that these gender differences begin to develop at an earlier age, prior to any pubertal neuters (Collins, 1991 Oliver and Thelen, 1996 Shapiro et al. , 1997 Wood et al. , 1996). The results of this stu dy provide support for a relationship between body image concerns and depressive symptoms (Herzog et al. 1992) and self-esteem (Wood et al. , 1996). Overall, children who expressed higher levels of body image disturbance reported higher rates of depressive symptoms and lower levels of global self-worth. Although this pattern was more perspicuous in girls, the same pattern existed for boys when body dissatisfaction was considered. Prior research has revealed support for both parental (Sanftner et al. , 1996 Thelen and Cormier, 1995) and peer (Cattarin and Thompson, 1994 Oliver and Thelen, 1996) in? uences on childrens eating and body image concerns. This study found support for peer and parental in? ences for girls and to a lesser extent, for boys. Most of the research on peer in? uences has been conducted with adolescent populations of girls (Levine et al. , 1994). In this study, similar patterns emerged for boys and girls when body dissatisfaction (as opposed to bulimic tendencies ) were evaluated. It may be that preadolescent boys are struggling with body dissatisfaction, but in such a manner that is not captured by the measurement of bulimic tendencies. The measurement of parental teasing from the POTS measure was particularly utilitarian in helping to understand boys experiences.A number of previous studies have documented the connections between negative verbal commentary and body image concerns in girls (Cattarin and Thompson, 1994 Schwartz et al. , 1999). In the current study, boys perceptions of parental teasing were related to higher levels of body dissatisfaction, bulimic tendencies, drive for thinness, family history of eating concerns, and depression and lower levels of global self-worth. Thus, further exploration of perceptions of parental teasing in both boys and girls may be fruitful. On the basis of the results of this study, the implications for prevention and intervention are numerous.Given the wealth of support for the existence of body imag e concerns in preadolescent children (Collins, 1991 Shapiro et al. , 1997 Thelen et al. , 1992 Wood et al. , 1996), it is imperative to address weight and body image concerns with children prior to adolescence. Psychoeducational programs could be helpful to inform children of the parental, peer, and sociocultural in? uences on their attitudes and beliefs concerning weight and physical appearance. Several universal psychoeducational programs 427 have been instituted and evaluated for school-aged children (reviewed in Levine and Smolak, 2001).Although this study found some gender differences in preadolescent childrens experiences of body image disturbance, the common pattern of associations among variables for both boys and girls would suggest that preventive efforts could be targeted to girls and boys together. Intervention programs are also necessary given the connections between familial in? uences and body image concerns in young children and the resultant connections between body image concerns and eating disorders (Cattarin and Thompson, 1994 Steinhausen and Vollrath, 1993 Thompson et al. 1999). Parents need to be educated about the negative consequences of their own weight and body image issues on the development of related problems in their children (Archibald et al. , 1999). Treatment programs should take family functioning into account and should address the strong connections between body image concerns and poor psychological functioning (Steinberg and Phares, 2001). There are several limitations to the study indicating that these results should be interpreted with caution. First, the ross-sectional personality of the study precludes interpretations related to causality. For example, it could be that higher levels of depression lead to higher rates of body dissatisfaction in both boys and girls. A prospective study of girls and boys from early childhood to adolescence and even adulthood could help answer the bearing of causality. In addition, becaus e there was a signi? cant difference in family history of eating concerns (FHE-C) between children with and without completed parental data, the preliminary analyses of parental reports have to be viewed cautiously.Although other studies have found relatively few differences between participating and nonparticipating mothers and fathers (Phares, 1995), the differences in this sample suggest that the parental data may not be representative of the larger population. This study attempted to limit common method variance by including parents rather than just relying on childrens self-reports. This inclusion of parents, however, led to other dif? culties. Future studies in this area could bene? t from more intense efforts to recruit and maintain parents for participation in research.Even with these limitations, this study provided support for parental and peer in? uences on the development of body image disturbance in preadolescent girls and boys. It is likely that both peers and family m embers contribute to the development of body image disturbance and weight concerns of young children. Although girls appear to be at greater risk for these concerns, this study suggests that attention to both boys and girls development of body image concerns is warranted. 428 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This study was completed as part of a masters thesis by the ? rst author under the direction of the second and third authors.REFERENCES Archibald, A. B. , Graber, J. A. , and Brooks-Gunn, J. (1999). Associations among parentadolescent relationships, pubertal growth, dieting, and body image in young adolescent girls A short-term longitudinal study. J. Res. Adolesc. , 9 395415. Attie, I. , and Brooks-Gunn, J. (1989). Development of eating problems in adolescent girls A longitudinal study. Dev. Psychol. 25 70 79. Brooks-Gunn, J. , Warren, M. P. , Rosso, J. , and Gargiulo, J. (1987). Validity of self-report measures of girls pubertal status. Child Dev. 58 829841. Bunnell, D. W. , Cooper, P. J. , Hert z, S. , and Shenker, I. R. (1992).Body shape concerns among adolescents. Int. J. Eating Disord. 11 79 83. Cash, T. F. (1995). developmental teasing about physical appearance Retrospective descriptions and relationships with body image. Soc. Behav. Pers. 23 123129. Cattarin, J. A. , and Thompson, J. K. (1994). A three-year longitudinal study of body image, eating disturbance, and general psychological functioning in adolescent females. Eating Disord. 2 114124. Childress, A. C. , Brewerton, T. D. , Hodges, E. L. , and Jarrell, M. P. (1993). The kids eating disorders muckle (KEDS) A study of middle school students. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc.Psychiatry 32 843849. Cohane, G. H. , and Pope, H. G. (2001). Body image in boys A review of the literature. Int. J. Eating Disord. 29 373379. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112 155159. Collins, M. E. (1991). Body ? gure perceptions and preferences among preadolescent children. Int. J. Eating Disord. 10 199208. Cusumano, D. L. , and Thompson, J. K. (2001). Media in? uence and body image in 811 year-old boys and girls A preliminary report on the Multidimensional Media In? uence Scale. Int. J. Eating Disord. 29 3744. Desmond, S. M. , Price, J. H. , Gray, N. , and OConnell, J. K. (1986).The etiology of adolescents perceptions of their weight. J. youth Adolesc. 15 461473. Field, A. E. , Austin, S. B. , Frazier, A. L. , Gillman, M. W. , Camargo, C. A. , and Colditz, G. A. (2002). Smoking, getting drunk, and engaging in bulimic behaviors In which order are the behaviors adopted? J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 41 846853. Field, A. E. , Camargo, C. A. , Taylor, C. B. , Berkey, C. S. , Roberts, S. B. , and Colditz, G. A. (2001). Peer, parent, and media in? uences on the development of weight concerns and usual dieting among preadolescent and adolescent girls and boys. Pediatrics 107 5460.Garner, D. M. (1984). Eating Disorder Inventory for Children (EDI-C). Unpublished manuscript. Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Pro? le for Children. Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Colorado. Herzog, D. B. , Keller, M. B. , Sacks, N. R. , Yeh, C. J. , and Lavori, P. W. (1992). psychiatric comorbidity in treatment-seeking anorexics and bulimics. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 31 810818. Hill, A. J. , Oliver, S. , and Rogers, P. J. (1992). Eating in the adult world The rise of dieting in childhood and adolescence. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 31 95105. Kostanski, M. and Gullone, E. (1999). Dieting and body image in the childs world Conceptualization and behavior. J. Genet. Psychol. 160 488499. Kovacs, M. (1992). Childrens Depression Inventory CDI Manual. Multi-Health Systems, North Tonawanda, NY. Inc. Phares, Steinberg, and Thompson Levine, M. P. , and Smolak, L. (2001). chief(a) prevention of body image disturbances and disordered eating in childhood and early adolescence. In Thompson, J. K. , and Smolak, L. , (eds. ), Body Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity in Yout h legal opinion, Prevention, and Treatment. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 37260. Levine, M. P. , Smolak, L. , Moodey, A. F. , Shuman, M. D. , and Hessen, L. D. (1994). Normative developmental challenges and dieting and eating disturbances in middle school girls. Int. J. Eating Disord. 15 1120. Mendelson, B. K. , White, D. R. , and Mendelson, M. J. (1996). Selfesteem and body esteem Effects of gender, age, and weight. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 17 321346. Moreno, A. , and Thelen, M. H. (1993). Parental factors related to bulimia nervosa. addictive Behav. 18 681689. Oliver, K. K. , and Thelen, M. H. (1996). Childrens perceptions of peer in? uence on eating concerns. Behav. Ther. 7 2539. Phares, V. (1995). Fathers and mothers participation in research. Adolescence 30 593602. Phares, V. (1996). Fathers and developmental psychopathology. New York Wiley. Pike, K. M. , and Rodin, J. (1991). Mothers, daughters, and disordered eating. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 100 198204. R icciardelli, L. A. , and McCabe, M. P. (2001). Childrens body image concerns and eating disturbance A review of the literature. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 21 325344. Ricciardelli, L. A. , McCabe, M. P. , and Ban? eld, S. (2000). Body image and body change methods in adolescent boys Role of parents, friends, and the media.J. Psychosom. Res. 49 189197. Rieves, L. , and Cash, T. F. (1996). Social developmental factors and womens body-image attitudes. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 11 6378. Rodin, J. , Silberstein, L. R. , and Striegel-Moore, R. H. (1985). Women and weight A normative discontent. In Sonderegger, T. B. (ed. ), Psychology and Gender Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 267307. Sands, R. , Tricker, J. , Sherman, C. , and Armatas, C. (1997). Disordered eating patterns, body image, self-esteem, and physical activity in preadolescent school children. Int. J. Eating Disord. 1 159 166. Sanftner, J. L. , Crowther, J. H. , Crawford, P. A. , and Watts, D. D. (1996). Maternal in? uences (or lack thereof) on daughters eating attitudes and behaviors. Eating Disord. 4 147159. Schur, E. A. , Sanders, M. , and Steiner, H. (2000). Body dissatisfaction and dieting in young children. Int. J. Eating Disord. 27 7482. Schwartz, D. J. , Phares, V. , Tantleff-Dunn, S. , and Thompson, J. K. (1999). Body image, psychological functioning, and parental feedback regarding physical appearance. Int. J. Eating Disord. 25 339 343. Shapiro, S. , Newcomb, M. , and Loeb, T. B. (1997). dismay of fat, disregulated-restrained eating, and body esteem Prevalence and gender differences among eight- to ten-year-old children. J. Clin. Child Psychol. 26 358365. Smolak, L. , and Levine, M. P. (2001). Body image in children. In Thompson, J. K. , and Smolak, L. (eds. ), Body Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity in Youth Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 41 66. Smolak, L. , Levine, M. P. , and Schermer, F. (1999). Parental input and weight concerns among elementary school children. Int. J. Eating Disord. 25 263271. Steinberg, A.B. , and Phares, V. (2001). Family functioning, body image, and eating disturbances. In Thompson, J. K. , and Smolak, L. (eds. ), Body Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity in Youth Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 127147. Steinhausen, H. , and Vollrath, M. (1993). The self-image of adolescent patients with eating Disord. Int. J. Eating Disord. 13 221227. Stice, E. (2001). Risk factors for eating pathology Recent advances and future directions. In R. Striegel-Moore & L. Smolak (Eds. ), Eating Gender Differences in Peer and Parental In? ences disorders Innovative directions in research and practice (pp. 51 73). Washington, DC American Psychological Association. Thelen, M. H. , and Cormier, J. (1995). Desire to be thinner and weight control among children and their parents. Behav. Ther. 26 85 99. Thelen, M. H. , Lawrence, C. , and Powell, A. (1992). Body image, weight control, and eating disorders among children. In Crowther, J. H. , Tennebaum, D. L. , Hobfoll, S. E. , and Stephens, M. A. P. (eds. ), The etiology of Bulimia Nervosa The Individual and Familial Context. Hemisphere, Washington, DC, pp. 82102. Thompson, J.K. (1996). Assessing body image disturbance Measures, methodology, and implementation. In Thompson, J. K. (ed. ), Body Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity An Integrative Guide for Assessment and Treatment. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 4982. Thompson, J. K. , Cattarin, J. , Fowler, B. , and Fisher, E. (1995). The Perception of Teasing Scale (POTS) A revision and extension of the Physical Appearance Related Teasing Scale (PARTS). J. Pers. Assess. 65 146157. Thompson, J. K. , and Heinberg, L. J. (1993). Preliminary test of two hypotheses of body image disturbance.Int. J. Eating Disord. 14 5963. 429 Thompson, J. K. , Heinberg, L. J. , Altabe, M. , an d Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting Beauty Theory, Assessment, and Treatment of Body Image Disturbance. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. Thompson, J. K. , and Smolak, L. (2001). Body image, eating disorders, and obesity in young The future is now. In Thompson, J. K. , and Smolak, L. (eds. ), Body Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity in Youth Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 1 39. VanderWal, J. S. , and Thelen, M. H. 2000). Predictors of body image dissatisfaction in elementary-age school girls. Eating Behav. 1 105122. Wadden, T. A. , Brown, G. , Foster, G. D. , and Linowitz, J. R. (1991). Salience of weight-related worries in adolescent males and females. Int. J. Eating Disord. 10 407414. Williamson, S. , and Delin, C. (2001). Young childrens ? gural selections Accuracy of reporting and body size dissatisfaction. Int. J. Eating Disord. 29 8084. Wood, K. C. , Becker, J. A. , and Thompson, J. K. (1996). Body image dissatisfaction in preadolescent children. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 17 85100.