Can People still rely on knowledge from experts? Essay -- essays resea

There is no evidence that scientists always tell the truth, and the chances are that they are only marginally more than h anest than, say, politicians (New Scientist)Knowledge fag be defined as an organised body of information which by experience, theories and studies help the human mind disc everywhere and develop new information. diametrical forms of knowledge include medical, religious, scientific, and common-sense and these in turn shake up their own lyric poem and status and there is privileging of some knowledge i.e., scientific. Like everything, knowledge is as well part of a social construction and in this assignment I go out take a look back at the historical and compare it to how we handle knowledge in to sidereal days society. By evaluating different forms of knowledge and looking at the evidence given it will travel muster out that whether we can dedicate experts isnt actually the problem, sort of its that we really have no choice, if we cant trust the expe rts and they are non as accurate as they make out, so who can we trust? This is actually quite a scary suggestion.When one hears the word specialist, one automatically assumes important, accurate and unreserved. iodin would never have criticized someone in the medical heavens say thirty or forty years ago, doctors were like divinity and knew best for everybody. Experts being well trained through demanding and rigorous apprenticeships carry good reputations and credentials and so obviously deserve our respect and trust, no? In the past the answer would have been yes as it was only a handful of people who had the opportunity to go to university (mainly men). But in our day and age it is the expectation of nearly everybody to acquire a degree, and it has now become the norm. We have a society in doubt and not knowing who they can trust. This can be seen by book gross revenue and search results on the Internet, the desire to acquire knowledge must connote we are less confident i n believing the professionals. For example TV05 shows an plus in visitors to natural health clinics for advice on MMR jabs, this does show uncertainty further as one lady commented in the program, there is much more choice and flexibility than the past. But on the other hand, as Tim metalworker pointed out, the search for alternative information other than that of an expert may have been solely for verification purposes. Perhaps what they really wanted from the exper... ...days experts, tomorrows fools (Kate Brown) Moreover, medicine being a key example, scientists constantly remove their minds from one day to the next on what is good for us and what is not. One day a pill is prescribed with the best intentions then we watch out later that we have put ourselves at risk by taking it. For example, Thalidomide was a drug prescribed by doctors to combat break of the day sickness in pregnant women. Hundreds put their trust in the alleged(prenominal) experts with disastrous conseque nces. Despite acute denial, we are all now certain Thalidomide causes birth deformities. (Kate Brown) So, can we trust expert knowledge? It seems very clear that we cant, but do we have much choice over the matter being another question.ReferencesNature. (London). August17th 1968 (editorial) New Scientist, September 5th 1968, p.497TV05 sound Cassette 9 side B Goldblatt, D (ed.) Knowledge and the Social Sciences Theory, method Practise, London, Routledge/The Open Universityhttp//www.unesco.org/courier/2000_04/uk/doss01.htmtopDr David Goldblatt DD100 Course Team CoChairKate Brown, Weald of Kent Grammar School. (www.culturewars.org.uk/2003-01/trustexperts.htm)www.godstruth.org/chap13