Life Course of a Mas Murderer Essay

On April 16, 2007 one of the about devastating mass murders in U.S history occurred at a Virginia college. Seung-Hui Cho a 23 year old reciprocal ohm Korean alone executed the killing of 33 people by securing colleges doors to hinder escape of whatsoever students. Events such as these are truly tragic and devastating to all involved. By gathering background information roughly Seung-Hui Cho, we can effectively examine fond development theories as they relate to Cho and review my analysis that this particular occurrence was pr level(p)table.Born in South Korea, Seung-Hui Cho immigrated to America when he was 8 years old. Although Cho was a quiet easy be get child he was awkwardly withdrawn and angry (cite book). by dint ofout train Cho was teased and bullied which could obtain been the cause of his average grades throughout school. Chos sister Sun-kyung was often in the school newspaper and was selected to attend the most elite Ivy League Universities (Schmalleger, 2009). C ho went on to attend Virginia tech where he was recognize once again for being extremely violent and was even removed from class. Cho was referred to multiple counsels and officials where he denied all thoughts of suicide and homicide. Although Cho denied these having these thoughts students that attend Virginia tech could see the imminent risk rising with Cho.There are numerous accessible development theories that can be applied to Seung-Hui Cho but I feel that the Life Course Perspective accurately represents Cho most effectively. With the social development perspective, human development occurs on many levels simotaneously, including psychological, biological, familial, interpersonal, cultural, social, and ecological (Schmalleger, 2009). brotherly development dheories focus on delinquencies over an extended expiration of time as well as transitions people go through within their life span. As the Life course perspective suggests Cho exhibitedshowed a distinct pattern of ant i-social conduct throughout his childhood and had never pull any crimes. Cho had a hard childhood and was in the shadows of his very no-hit sister. Even in college Cho had no friends and began to look up to other school shooters as martyrs. Although these individuals were not his friends at all in his situation they were the side by side(predicate) thing to having friends. In college Cho was accused of stalking women on two contrary occasions, was caught taking photos of the legs of female students in class and was separated out of classes. I believe that Chos antisocial life-style along with the transition any from home eventually lead him to commit the mass murder. Chos anti-social lifestyle seemed to escalate to criminal behaviors from the time he went off to college until the time of the Virginia technical school shooting.I believe that this tragedy could puzzle been prevented if the proper check measures and word techniques were taken. As a boy Cho should have been take n in for a mental evaluation but I believe the integration of his family into the American society prevented that. In high school Cho being bullied and teased could have been put to a stop by teachers and surrounding students. Also when Cho started physical composition gruesome poems short stories and plays he should have been recommended to a counselor. Any counselor that Cho had encounters with could have been a lot more persistent in acquiring to the bottom of Chos situations. A teacher college teacher doesnt solely separate a student from her class. Finally the two females who Cho supposedly pedunculate could have reported Cho and pressed charges, preventing him from escalating in criminal nature.Seung-Hui Cho may have lived a particularly difficult life but with appropriate preventative and treatment measures the Virginia Tech shooting could have been prevented. One way this could have been prevented is with the support of his family. Chos family should have played a larger character reference in providing guidance and discipline and instilling sound values in Cho. Also social institutions failed him. He was bullied in teased in schools and perform which could have been the reason for him being anti-social throughout his lifespan (Seung-Hui, 2013). Finally individuals in Chos life should have intervened immediately and constructively when delinquent behaviorfirst occurred. After closely reviewing Chos background information and examining social development theories as they relate to Cho my analysis is that the Virginia Tech shooting was preventable.ReferencesSchmalleger, F. (2009). Criminology today An integrative introduction. (5th ed., pp. 297-341). Columbus, OH Pearson Prentice Hal. Retrieved from http//devry.vitalsource.com/ Seung-Hui Cho. (2013). The Biography Channel website. Retrieved 0622, Jul 28, 2013, from http//www.biography.com/people/seung-hui-cho-235991.